|
The following is an excerpt from a piece written by Equity Alliance staff entitled “Where Are All the Students of Color in Gifted Education?” which appeared in the May/June 2009 issue of Principal magazine.
United States, much like special education, is grounded in beliefs that some students demonstrate a need for specialized education that, historically and currently, has not been provided in U.S. public schools. Special and gifted education scholars and practitioners alike recognize that opportunities to learn need to be improved so that all students have equitable educational access and participation. Yet, as principals strive to achieve this goal, they often experience tensions around: the purpose, scope, and location of the education they provide; the preparation of teachers for an increasingly diverse student population; and determining the extent to which the needs for specialized instruction create educational fields separate from general education. Although specific federal mandates (i.e., the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act) provide some guidance for
|
addressing the needs of students with disabilities, there are no similar mandates for gifted education services.
Ford, Grantham, and Whiting (2008) note that black, Hispanic, and Native American students have always been under-represented in gifted education, and that this under-representation has increased over time for black students in particular (Ford, 1998). Principals can confront this issue by:
- Addressing lower expectations of culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students through professional learning and teacher preparation that is grounded in multicultural and culturally responsive pedagogy and practice. The National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (NCCRESt) has many tools principals can use.
- Adopting culturally responsive definitions of giftedness, explicitly acknowledging that giftedness occurs across gender and cultural, linguistic, and income groups.
|
Principals should work with district administrators, school psychologists, and classroom teachers to examine the current definitions of giftedness and work to ensure these definitions convey that giftedness is found in students of all backgrounds and life experiences.
- Broadening definitions of giftedness to include those students who underachieve as well as those who achieve at or above comparison groups. Giftedness should not be reserved only for those students who are achieving high grades or test scores.
- Building systemic evaluation of under-representation of CLD students into evaluation of all gifted education programs and services.
- Principals should continuously assess, on a year-to-year basis, the racial, ethnic, gender, and linguistic demographics of students accessing gifted instructional programming, as compared with the demographics of all students.
|